Radiometric dating dinosaur bones

Those astonishing data give a clue why the research report was censored: It was revolutionary in a way that those two chairmen did not like. Dinosaurs have been carbon-14 dated to much more recently ### . It now appears obvious that both kinds of animals [dinosaurs and pterosaurs] lived together much more recently, although two supposedly scientific authorities have censored this discovery, in my opinion, preventing public viewing. Compared to the conventional theory of dinosaurs’ being at minimum 65 million years old, the time it would take soft tissue to degrade and the Radiocarbon dating is the most accurate, most studied, most verified of all the radiometric dating schemes. they gave 14C [carbon-14] dating results from many bone samples from eight dinosaur specimens. But if dinosaurs really were millions of years old, there should not be one atom of 14C left in them.Carbon-14 Dating and Dinosaurs Radiocarbon dating is the most accurate and most verifiable of the radiometric dating systems. Decide for yourself if this is a case of censorship. One of the chief reasons for this is that absolute dates for carbon material can be absolutely independently verified for certain parts of its useful range.. All gave dates ranging from 22,000 to 39,000 years . This helps us to understand how that species fits into the evolutionary tree of change; when did they first appear and when did the last of their kind walk this Earth?

radiometric dating dinosaur bones-88radiometric dating dinosaur bones-75radiometric dating dinosaur bones-54

So why did two chairmen of the 2012 Western Pacific Geophysics Meeting in Singapore delete one of the oral-presentation reports from their official website? The whole report was just deleted from public view, with no online explanation. The oral presentation by the Paleochronology group was given in 2012 but the total report was deleted by two chairmen of the conference.

" data-medium-file=" w=300" data-large-file=" w=676" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1797" src=" w=676&h=306" alt="scientific conference report censored" srcset=" w=676&h=306 676w, w=1352&h=610 1352w, w=150&h=68 150w, w=300&h=135 300w, w=768&h=346 768w, w=1024&h=462 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" / group asked for an explanation; they were given the following: Two chairmen explained why they deleted the abstract of the oral report, but they did not give any details about why they censored the material.

Radiometric dating involves exploiting the radioactive decay of unstable atoms naturally present in the structure of bones and rocks.

These unstable atoms (radioactive isotopes) have a known ‘half-life’, which is the amount of time it takes for half of the isotopes in a given sample to undergo decay.

Notice how greatly the above data vary from the millions-of-years figures commonly proclaimed in Western media and textbooks.

Radiocarbon dating of dinosaur fossils has generally not been done until recent years, for the great majority of scientists had assumed such testing would be pointless.”Isotopes of an element differ just by their number of neutrons in their nucleus, for example, C.In terms of charge, they are identical, meaning that they have the same chemical properties.This means that it is almost impossible for isotopes to enter or leave the premises. its stable decay products, it is possible to calculate the amount of time the bone had been trapped under the Earth!When dating a specimen, there are many different isotopes that can be tracked.However, mass spectrometry (MS) can be employed to exploit their differences in mass.

Tags: , ,