Free sex cam strangres - Actaul free sex chats

193.1 , 6 February 2006 (UTC) I think the section should be revived.European do not adhere to freedom of speech seen in America so accusation of hypocracy is at least a valid topic of discussion. Just yesterday the Superbowl finals were said to be censored in real-time, by e.g.Are they not showing disrespect to the hindus when they first butcher their GOD and then eat it?

Actaul free sex chats-15

the people that instigated this crap should be ashamed of themselves they're obviously people that have too much time and ink on their hands and now the blood of innocent that have been caught in the cross fire. Racism against whites deserves to be acknowledged every bit as racism against non-whites.

Merton 4 February 2006 (UTC) It's against a nationality and not an ethnic group, but that's semantics.

While you could make a case for that (and doubtless, you would because of personal bias) it is probably also not accurate.

After all, Danes allow ridicule of Christian icons and other religious icons in equal measure (see the comment in the article that "In 1984 the artist Jens Jørgen Thorsen was commissioned by a local art club to paint the wall of a railway station." Yes you could argue this was a self referential act (someone within a culture refering internally to an aspect of that culture) but that still waters down the prejudice argument.

Anyway, the article does note the negative reactions and the issued threats.

If you ask me, there's no point in adding 'and that's bad'.

--Kizor , 4 February 2006 (UTC) It not racism, its the prejudice toward religion.

You can say the Muslim held prejudice toward Christianity (and vice versa), but you can't say all Muslim hate Nordic Europeans, becuase is Muslim is a cross-race religion, and welcome any race. , 4 February 2006 (UTC) Its racism as Muslims are themselves one race of people who worship in Arabic.

All cause they were afraid of another Nipplegate like the one caused by Janet Jackson. (rather expression, and such nudity is not permitted by Islam either in many cases, especially for Women) However cutting songs live while performed, or speeches just so nobody ever accidentially pops out the "f*" word, or (as we all heard) even censoring and faking large number or articles HERE is not, what I'd call freedom of speech...

--Richard , 7 February 2006 (UTC) Um, care to elaborate?

I am a professed born again whitey that take offense at this whole escapade I believe dearly in the value of a free press and belive just as strongly that one should have the riht to practice ones religion but for these halfwitted journalist t stand up and pretend that by offended 25% of the popuation of the world they have in some way or other sruck a blow for free speech firstly as the cliche goes free speech is not free and it is certainly not been purchased from some broken crayon in a second rate comic daily in...

Tags: , ,